At least bring common sense to the table
What is the truth, yea right?
Published on February 24, 2011 By BoobzTwo In International

What are conspiracy theories and from whence do they come? My Father was quite (?) intelligent (in a drunken sort of stupor) always answering the most questions on Jeopardy and such … but he went to the grave with the firm belief that we never landed on the moon …. There were NO arguments or ‘proof’ that he would accept … and I just could not understood … until later in my life.

Conspiracy theories (if not just politically motivated) are like legends and customs and beliefs in the unexplainable, they are rooted in the truth or at least a plausible alternatives to approved (governmental) propaganda. I don’t know about you, but I can appreciate a good conspiracy (mystery) … whatever.

What I prefer to do when in this mode is to pick the prevalent (official) explanations apart and compare their ‘stuff’ to things I know or have witnessed. I guess what I am saying is that I am ALWAYS cognizant of the expression “I am from the government and I am here to help you” in all my dealings with them. Anyway in random order …

9/11: I have spent a lot of time watching buildings fall from some anomaly or another and from intentional destruction keeping in mind collateral damage (my husband actually likes this stuff?). There is no doubt what happened initially to the twin towers (is there?).  So we need to analyze the reality of the results. In all my observations (couldn’t watch them all I suppose), I cannot recall any instance in which one let alone two buildings of even much less stature, that fell straight down without human intervention. The implications here are staggering and just about impossible for me to accept … but there are sound arguments for this line of thinking. There is much more to this issue I assure you.

WWII: Why did we become involved in it … or maybe a better question would be ‘why did Japan get in’ (Start it?) I will give you a little hint here … OIL … and what do you think will result when OUR OIL gets cut off?  Pretty much the exact same thing Japan enjoyed, I would suspect. This couldn’t happen if we were not so dependent on foreign oil … which of course we are. This could not happen if the US Government wasn’t considered (rightly so I guess) to be the world’s enforcers. And this could not happen if we did not live in a country of self-serving miscreants … which of course we have. This can and will happen as conditions are ripe for domination … and there are sound arguments for this line of thinking.

Iraq: There are seemingly many reasons to go to war (I wonder what they are though?). I think an actual affront to our National Security might do it but … well, our media (the largest enabler of our government propaganda machine) tells us whatever it is we are supposed to accept, know AND believe (I run into this brick wall daily). You remember those trustworthy folk in the media who salivate over the excretions of our even MORE trustworthy government. If you are still open to suggestion … I would hint at … OIL as opposed to WMD’s or ‘yellow cake’!

Well, there are a few more examples I could point out but I think I will have already brought enough fury on myself as it is. Believe what you want (I do), trust whoever you want to (I might I ask for some common sense here), conspire as you see fit … please try to remember the ‘theory’ part here.


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Mar 05, 2011

In the past we didn't have all the modern electronic media aids so the flash to bang time for news reporting was a lot farther from the event than it is now.  News stories in WWII were weeks and sometimes months after the event, which kind of took the edge off of the stories.  How would our folks at home react if D-Day happened this week?  How would they respond to the 10,000 dead in a day?  When there is a gap, there is more time for the results of those decisions to become apparent...for good or bad.  Whatever that is worth. 

That paragraph seems kinda rambly.  I just think that it is too easy to look back for the negative and miss the immediacy of the situation.  Just because FDR was obsessed with not looking weak doesn't mean he was always wrong.  He was wrong on his fiscal policies and gets credit for rescuing us from the depression when it was the Japanese and Germans who ended our depression.  But his manuevering to get us into the war made it possible for the world to be rid of some reeeeeaally bad actors. And it established the US as a world power.  You may have an opinion on whether or not that is a good thing.  "W" has many detractors and his foreign policies made a lot of folks angry...but if there is gonna be a fight (it was the radical Islamists who came after us...) it is a better deal to do the fighting in their yard instead of ours.  I do believe it is possible for men in leadership positions to be motivated by better goals than self interest...even baser men. 

on Apr 28, 2011

BootsWilliams
Reply #2
BootsWilliams

I am sure there is a question in here somewhere ... maybe this will supply some answers for you.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/collapses.html

 

on Apr 28, 2011

Big Fat Daddy: How do you keep a secret ... you brainwash, lie, cheat, steal, bribe, threaten and murder; seems to be the preferred methods anyway. But we are not talking about secrets here are we? The whole point is to demonstrate that there is the government version and then there are many others … but we have accepted the false  premise that anything in contradiction to the official versions are “Conspiracy Theories” end of story. I think it likely that everyone involved in treason has a lot of self-motivation to clam up. People have stood up and voiced their concerns and have just been ignored or silenced or worse but in any event, marginalized. By far though, the best way to keep a secret is to never ever admit it was a lie. After all, who in America would even consider it possible for our presidents and their staffs to actually lie to the American people, go figure?

The problem is that you have bought into the story that we HAD to go to war in the first place. There is just no viable way to jump from 9/11 to war in Iraq in less than two years on the merits of the information available at the time and most assuredly now. Hindsight is just a tool to critique events and nothing more. But if information is produced that contradicts the establishment, then it is found to be lacking merit and unnecessary.

2 Pages1 2